← Day 24全部Day 26 →
Day 25 · 第 4 阶段

TED Interview · David Eagleman(5-10 分钟)

与 Day24 不重复

练习进度自动保存
🔊

本日音频 · material.mp3

正常 1.0 倍速 · 用于 Step 1 Blind Listening 与 Step 5 Final Listening

下载 ⬇

今日材料

SourceTED Audio Collective
Duration5:00
CEFRB2-C1
连续跟随目标连续 5 分钟
本日重点与 Day24 不重复

30 分钟训练流程

0 / 5 步完成

Day 25

Today’s Material

Title: TED Interview:David Eagleman(5:00–10:00)

Source: TED Audio Collective

Duration: 5:00(5:00–10:00)

CEFR Estimated Level: B2-C1

Today’s Continuous Listening Target: 连续 5 分钟

本日训练目标

与 Day24 不重复

本日主题

Eagleman 继续深入讲大脑如何处理感觉输入

Step 1:Blind Listening

时间: 5 分钟

规则:

关闭中文字幕。 关闭英文字幕。 正常 1.0 倍速。

禁止暂停。 禁止倒退。

即使有一句没有听懂,也继续听。

听完以后回答:

  1. Who is talking?
  2. What are they talking about?
  3. What happened?
  4. What’s the main point?

Step 2:Chunk Listening

时间: 7 分钟

每约 3 至 5 分钟暂停。

每次暂停以后只总结”意思”。

不要尝试背原句。

示例:

He’s explaining why he left.

She disagrees with him.

They’re talking about what happened yesterday.

Step 3:Transcript Check

时间: 8 分钟

打开英文 transcript。

只寻找下面三种问题:

A: 单词认识,但声音没有听出来。

B: 单词认识,但意思反应太慢。

C: 真正不知道的表达。

每天最多挑选 5 个重点。

Step 4:Fast Processing

时间: 5 分钟

选择当天最困难的 3 至 5 个句子。

每句话:

听一次 理解 跟读 再听 再跟读

不要逐词翻译。

Step 5:Final Listening

时间: 5 分钟

关闭 transcript 和字幕。

从头完整播放。

禁止暂停。

结束以后进行 30 至 60 秒英语口头复述。

可以使用:

Basically, they were talking about…

At first…

Then…

The main point was…

In the end…

Daily Score

理解率: ____ %

明显掉线次数:


最长连续跟随时间:


需要 transcript 才能理解的比例: ____ %

今天最明显的问题:



Transcript · 英文原文

先盲听再对照。只找 A(没听出)B(反应慢)C(真不会)三类问题。

# Unlocking the mysteries of our brain | David Eagleman

Segment00:05:00 – 00:10:00

Full episode transcript, trimmed to training segment.

==================================================

Chris Anderson

So what, we'll come onto that part a bit more, but let's start, first of all, thinking about someone with all five senses. If it is five, uh, basically working, kind of, quote as “normal”. Um, talk a bit about this miracle of how this, this brain in the dark of, of a baby sort of developing you, you've got this blizzard of it incoming, just electrical signals, and yet somehow after a year or two, they are interpreted as “There is a face that I love and light up to. And if I say, ‘Mama’, something smiles. And if I say ‘wah’ what water comes or milk comes.” Or, so like how, how are those pieces possibly put together?

David Eagleman

Yeah. Well, okay. So as far as you know, this debate about nature and nurture? Totally dead question nowadays because it's always both.So baby drops into the world knowing a lot of things already. Like how to mimic a facial expression. You know, you can stick out your tongue at a baby and the baby will do the same stuff like that. So, which is actually very complex visual-motor task to do. So there's some amount of pre-programming, but the interesting part is all the stuff that we absorb from there.

And so the trick that Mother Nature discovered is to drop us into the world with a half-baked brain and then we, you know, absorb the world around us such that, you know, an alligator born today is just the same as an alligator born a hundred thousand years ago.

But we drop into the world, by the time we're, you know, five, six years old, we’ve absorbed essentially everything humans have done before us. Our language, our culture, our family tradition, our nation's traditions, and so on. And we get to springboard off the top of that, and that just made us such a runaway species, we’ve taken over every corner of the planet as a result of not having to learn, you know, not having to play the role of a human over and over again, but constantly ratcheting up in what we're doing.

Chris Anderson

So this, this process of understanding, it seems to be built, I mean, at some point, right? Right. At the base level, it starts presumably because there are real things out there in the world. So, so say there's a puppy in the house, somehow the baby learns that, the same thing that sends at the same time that you get certain visual sensations you might hear “Yap, yap, yap.” And, um, and you might have the sort of the lick of puppy tongue on your face or something like that. And so the brain says, “These must be associated.” And then from that, a further understanding comes up. Is that about what happens?

David Eagleman

That’s exactly right. And, and the interesting part is that fundamentally the brain is multisensory, which means it's trying to make links across the senses. So you just got these little windows on the world, right? I'm just picking up a little slice of electromagnetic radiation here and some air compression waves here and other. And so what my brain's trying to do is put together, “Ah, there's an object that is a collection of these things altogether.”

Um, now the interesting part is when you're born, you don't know how to use your eyes or your ears, anything like that. And so it, it is a learned thing, but somehow when you learn it enough, it just becomes a qualia. You have a direct subjective experience of it.

Chris Anderson

So you, qualia is the subjective feeling of something.

David Eagleman

Exactly. So when you see the puppy, you don't think, “Hey, there's a bunch of photons that happen to be in the shape that I've seen before. And there's, you know, some medium frequencies hitting my eardrum that's probably a bark, and so on.” You just feel like, “Oh, there's the puppy making noise,” and such. Now the weird part is how do, how do qualia come about? How is it that information—which, you know, we can build a, uh, you can build a computer to recognize a puppy, but presumably it doesn't experience the puppiness and the love about the puppy and so on.

Chris Anderson

Yeah. Well, you're talking here about consciousness, so that's what I—we might come back to that. That's, that's a very, very hard one. But to go back to the Mr. Potato Head thing, so some of where this has come from is that you've observed that people who are lacking one sense, so say they, they are deaf or blind, their brain is, is able to repurpose the area that would have been used for, say the missing visual field and do something else with it. Talk a bit more about that.

David Eagleman

Exactly. You know, it's funny because I feel like that's something that neuroscience knows, but it's always considered sort of a side, uh, property of the brain. But to my mind, that's the most important thing or examples like that, because what it demonstrates is that although we have this textbook model of the brain—like here's visual system and here's hearing and touch and so on—that’s just how it usually turns out. But, exactly as you said, if somebody goes deaf, that part of the brain is taken over. Someone goes blind, that part of the brain is taken over. It's a very fluid system.

Chris Anderson

So one of the things you've observed and seen is that if someone is born deaf, for example, um, if you give them alternative access to audio information, not through their ears, but for example, on that wristband you're wearing, right, right there. Um, that they can actually start hearing through their wrist.

# Unlocking the mysteries of our brain | David Eagleman

Segment00:05:00 – 00:10:00

Full episode transcript, trimmed to training segment.

==================================================

[0005:10] Chris Anderson: So what, we'll come onto that part a bit more, but let's start, first of all, thinking about someone with all five senses. If it is five, uh, basically working, kind of, quote as “normal”. Um, talk a bit about this miracle of how this, this brain in the dark of, of a baby sort of developing you, you've got this blizzard of it incoming, just electrical signals, and yet somehow after a year or two, they are interpreted as “There is a face that I love and light up to. And if I say, ‘Mama’, something smiles. And if I say ‘wah’ what water comes or milk comes.” Or, so like how, how are those pieces possibly put together?

[0005:54] David Eagleman: Yeah. Well, okay. So as far as you know, this debate about nature and nurture? Totally dead question nowadays because it's always both.So baby drops into the world knowing a lot of things already. Like how to mimic a facial expression. You know, you can stick out your tongue at a baby and the baby will do the same stuff like that. So, which is actually very complex visual-motor task to do. So there's some amount of pre-programming, but the interesting part is all the stuff that we absorb from there.

And so the trick that Mother Nature discovered is to drop us into the world with a half-baked brain and then we, you know, absorb the world around us such that, you know, an alligator born today is just the same as an alligator born a hundred thousand years ago.

But we drop into the world, by the time we're, you know, five, six years old, we’ve absorbed essentially everything humans have done before us. Our language, our culture, our family tradition, our nation's traditions, and so on. And we get to springboard off the top of that, and that just made us such a runaway species, we’ve taken over every corner of the planet as a result of not having to learn, you know, not having to play the role of a human over and over again, but constantly ratcheting up in what we're doing.

[0007:02] Chris Anderson: So this, this process of understanding, it seems to be built, I mean, at some point, right? Right. At the base level, it starts presumably because there are real things out there in the world. So, so say there's a puppy in the house, somehow the baby learns that, the same thing that sends at the same time that you get certain visual sensations you might hear “Yap, yap, yap.” And, um, and you might have the sort of the lick of puppy tongue on your face or something like that. And so the brain says, “These must be associated.” And then from that, a further understanding comes up. Is that about what happens?

[0007:36] David Eagleman: That’s exactly right. And, and the interesting part is that fundamentally the brain is multisensory, which means it's trying to make links across the senses. So you just got these little windows on the world, right? I'm just picking up a little slice of electromagnetic radiation here and some air compression waves here and other. And so what my brain's trying to do is put together, “Ah, there's an object that is a collection of these things altogether.”

Um, now the interesting part is when you're born, you don't know how to use your eyes or your ears, anything like that. And so it, it is a learned thing, but somehow when you learn it enough, it just becomes a qualia. You have a direct subjective experience of it.

[0008:13] Chris Anderson: So you, qualia is the subjective feeling of something.

[0008:16] David Eagleman: Exactly. So when you see the puppy, you don't think, “Hey, there's a bunch of photons that happen to be in the shape that I've seen before. And there's, you know, some medium frequencies hitting my eardrum that's probably a bark, and so on.” You just feel like, “Oh, there's the puppy making noise,” and such. Now the weird part is how do, how do qualia come about? How is it that information—which, you know, we can build a, uh, you can build a computer to recognize a puppy, but presumably it doesn't experience the puppiness and the love about the puppy and so on.

[0008:45] Chris Anderson: Yeah. Well, you're talking here about consciousness, so that's what I—we might come back to that. That's, that's a very, very hard one. But to go back to the Mr. Potato Head thing, so some of where this has come from is that you've observed that people who are lacking one sense, so say they, they are deaf or blind, their brain is, is able to repurpose the area that would have been used for, say the missing visual field and do something else with it. Talk a bit more about that.

[0009:14] David Eagleman: Exactly. You know, it's funny because I feel like that's something that neuroscience knows, but it's always considered sort of a side, uh, property of the brain. But to my mind, that's the most important thing or examples like that, because what it demonstrates is that although we have this textbook model of the brain—like here's visual system and here's hearing and touch and so on—that’s just how it usually turns out. But, exactly as you said, if somebody goes deaf, that part of the brain is taken over. Someone goes blind, that part of the brain is taken over. It's a very fluid system.

[0009:44] Chris Anderson: So one of the things you've observed and seen is that if someone is born deaf, for example, um, if you give them alternative access to audio information, not through their ears, but for example, on that wristband you're wearing, right, right there. Um, that they can actually start hearing through their wrist.

Vocabulary · 本日最多 5 个重点

Vocabulary — Day 25

每天最多 5 个最值得训练的项。优先:自然口语短语、phrasal verbs、连读后难识别的表达、高频口语结构。 所有例句与读音均依据本日真实音频。凡标注 STREAM_ONLY 的项目,需在观看后核对官方字幕再填写。


1. nature and nurture

Expression: nature and nurture

Meaning: 先天与后天

Original sentence: This debate about nature and nurture? Totally dead question nowadays.

Natural pronunciation note: nature and 连读 na-chə-rən;nurture /ˈnɜː.tʃɚ/。

My own simple paraphrase: 是基因还是环境决定人。

Example: Language learning is a mix of nature and nurture.

2. half-baked brain

Expression: half-baked brain

Meaning: 没「烤熟」的大脑(比喻不成熟、待塑造)

Original sentence: The trick that Mother Nature discovered is to drop us into the world with a half-baked brain.

Natural pronunciation note: half-baked 连读 haf-baked;重读 baked。

My own simple paraphrase: 婴儿大脑没长全,靠后天吸收来完善。

Example: We’re born with a half-baked brain that fills in over time.

3. springboard off

Expression: springboard off

Meaning: 以此为跳板

Original sentence: We get to springboard off the top of that.

Natural pronunciation note: springboard 重读 spring;off 重读。

My own simple paraphrase: 站在前人的积累上继续往上跳。

Example: Learning from others lets you springboard off their experience.

4. a runaway species

Expression: a runaway species

Meaning: 势不可挡的物种

Original sentence: That just made us such a runaway species.

Natural pronunciation note: runaway 重读 run;species 重读 spe。

My own simple paraphrase: 进步速度停不下来的人类。

Example: Our ability to share knowledge made us a runaway species.

5. ratcheting up

Expression: ratcheting up

Meaning: 不断升级 / 节节攀升

Original sentence: Constantly ratcheting up in what we’re doing.

Natural pronunciation note: ratcheting 重读 ra;up 重读。

My own simple paraphrase: 水平/程度不断往上抬。

Example: The difficulty keeps ratcheting up each chapter.